Kudos Section

نویسنده

  • Taras Usichenko
چکیده

Adamson Muula The article by Skene [1] has touched on an important topic in as far as global health research is concerned. Skene’s barometer is certainly a critical contribution to the discourse in research ethics that could be used in both extra-territorial and intra-territorial research. There are, however, several areas where I feel a different opinion would enrich the discussion. My fi rst concern is that the author presents this barometer with the slices of the pie having sharp demarcations. To the reader, this may suggest that there are clear-cut transitions from one area of the barometer to the other. In reality, however, issues in ethics are less well demarcated. For instance, a research area in itself may fi t more in one color zone, but the participants chosen may move it towards the next color zone. Another researcher studying the same research area but different participant groups may be in a different color zone. In general, however, gradations with one color merging into the other, rather than clearcut demarcations, would be more likely to be observed in practice. The fact that a different scheme could present reality more clearly is exemplifi ed by the author’s use of the “green zone”, where research on competent adults, research on vulnerable populations, and research on children have all been grouped under one “roof”. Skene’s barometer may also be modifi ed if one considers that vulnerability can be determined on a categorical basis (all persons in that category are vulnerable) versus on a situational basis [2]. For example, why should all persons under sentence of capital punishment be considered vulnerable? Do we assume that these people cannot make informed decisions which are so central in research ethics? Are we worried about coercion or constraining factors? It is of interest that Skene’s barometer has research on stored human tissue and observing people in a public place as neither associated with any laws and no requiring ethics oversight. Did the author mean that a researcher intending to video tape (which is by the way observational) in a restaurant not require ethics oversight? I would argue that stored human specimens should also be associated with ethical oversight. Mfutso-Bengo and I have made a case for continued ethical oversight on stored specimens in international collaborative research [3]. This view has been supported by Ndebele, who has advocated for materials transfer agreements [4]. Although we have made arguments based on actual specimens, we have not argued in support of agreements on use of data that emanates from international research. The author also writes, “research that imposes severe suffering on animals, especially for a cosmetic rather than scientifi c purpose, would be widely condemned as well as unlawful in Australia”. I do understand that the author writes from an Australian standard point, but the statement implicitly suggests that research conducted for cosmetic improvements cannot be for “scientifi c purposes”. What is the author’s defi nition of science? It would certainly make a difference if what the author actually meant was research for cosmetic purposes or gains versus research for treatment of diseases (although cosmetics can also be a treatment for disfi guring human diseases). It is interesting that the author also suggests that research on cloning “would be unlawful in Australia and almost universally regarded as ethically unacceptable”. This certainly brings into question the thesis that research ethics are universal. I guess in the next decades, the world will grapple with the ethical conduct of research in space. Who has jurisdiction when research occurs in outer space? These questions and others will certainly confront humanity, if not in this century, perhaps in the next. Finally, because of the use of specifi c examples and situations, Skene’s barometer may be applicable to Australia but not so much to the wider world. I guess the tool will undergo transformations where general algorithms and principles will be considered such that the barometer will be used beyond Australia.

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

A Comparison of Large-S ale Overlay Management Te hniques

Abstra t In this paper we present Kudos, a novel hierar hi al, topology aware overlay onstru tion algorithm. Kudos is an extension of Narada, an existing topology aware overlay; by adding hierar hy, we have signi antly in reased the s alability of Kudos while maintaining the performan e advantage of topology awareness. Additionally, we provide the rst detailed omparison between topology aware a...

متن کامل

Analysing researchers’ outreach efforts and the association with publication metrics: A case study of Kudos

With the growth of scholarly collaboration networks and social communication platforms, members of the scholarly community are experimenting with their approach to disseminating research outputs, in an effort to increase their audience and outreach. However, from a researcher's point of view, it is difficult to determine whether efforts to make work more visible are worthwhile (in terms of the ...

متن کامل

Dissecting Genuine and Deceptive Kudos: The Case of Online Hotel Reviews

As users continue to rely on online hotel reviews for making purchase decisions, the trend of posting deceptive reviews to heap praises and kudos is gradually becoming a wellestablished e-business malpractice. Conceivably, it is not trivial for users to distinguish between genuine and deceptive kudos in reviews. Hence, this paper identifies three linguistic cues that could offer telltale signs ...

متن کامل

Emoticons Signal Expertise in Technical Web Forums

Past research has demonstrated intercultural differences in emoticon use with effects of the topic of discourse (e.g. science vs. politics) interacting with the culture of online postings (e.g. UK, Italy, Sweden, Germany). The current research focuses within a discourse, and within a lingua franca for communication and attempts to assess whether emoticon use varies as a function of user-type wi...

متن کامل

The Cajal Club: Its origin, originator and benefactor, Wendell J. S. Krieg.

The Cajal Club is a small organization of neuroscientists that has met annually since it was founded in 1947. The fourteen founding members voted at its organizational meeting that the Club be named to honor the great Spanish Neuroscientist, Santiago Ramon y Cajal. The beginnings and the early development of the Cajal Club that was led by Professor Wendell J. S. Krieg, a distinguished neuroanat...

متن کامل

Two virgins ? Use condoms?

Sounds like you?ve had an exciting summer! Kudos to you for thinking ahead about how to practice safer sex. Condoms, when used correctly, are an effective method for protecting against sexually transmitted infections (STI) and pregnancy, which is why they?re highly recommended. There?s often pressure to make your first time memorable, and it may feel like using condoms takes away from that. Ins...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

ثبت نام

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

عنوان ژورنال:
  • Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

دوره 3  شماره 

صفحات  -

تاریخ انتشار 2006